🔊 Update of CSPaper Review (2025-07-06): AAAI, prompt injection detection, ArXiv fixes, and more!
-
Hi CSPaper community
,We’re excited to share a fresh update to https://review.cspaper.org with new features and improvements based on your amazing feedback!
New Conference Support: AAAI is here!You asked, we delivered! AAAI support has landed:
AAAI 2022 – Main Technical Track- AAAI 2024 – Safe and Robust AI Track
Now you can explore, review, and engage with these AAAI tracks directly on CSPaper — just like you asked!
We're also hearing strong interest in expanding to other venues such as CHI, AISTATS, KDD ADS track, and even journals. If there's a track you'd like to see supported, please keep the suggestions coming — via the questionnaire, email, or by replying right here in the forum.
️ Behind the scenes:
Supporting a new venue involves careful agent design, implementation, testing, and benchmarking. We only release new targets once they meet our internal quality thresholds.
In the future, we plan to share our benchmarking methodology, so you can better understand how we evaluate and maintain review quality across venues.
️
️ New! Dedicated Check for Prompt Injection & Hidden ManipulationIn response to recent community concerns and real-world incidents, we’ve introduced a dedicated task for our review agents to detect prompt injection and hidden manipulative content in submitted papers.
- Our system now explicitly checks for attempts to manipulate AI-based reviews, including hidden prompts (e.g., white/invisible text, steganography, or suspicious formatting).
- If any such manipulation is detected, the agent will flag the submission and clearly report the issue.
- This protects the integrity of both human and AI-driven peer review and helps keep our platform trustworthy for all users.
- Note that if you submitted a PDF and any malicious text is invisible within the PDF, the CSPaper Review tool will automatically exclude such prompt injections, as our process begins with a vision-based approach to recognize visible text, images, and tables.
We’re committed to staying ahead of new risks in academic publishing. Your vigilance and feedback are essential in helping us refine these defenses — please let us know if you spot suspicious tactics or have suggestions for improvement!
️ ArXiv Handling Fixes & EnhancementsDuring our beta launch week, we uncovered several issues related to processing ArXiv LaTeX source code — especially resolving main tex file, correct version and encoding images. We've rolled out major improvements to ensure better coverage for ArXiv papers.
️ Note: CSPaper currently supports ArXiv papers only if they include LaTeX source files. We might look into support for PDF-only submissions, and your feedback will help us prioritize this!
️ Under-the-Hood OptimizationsWe’ve cleaned up and refactored our backend code to:
- Improve system robustness
- Eliminate redundant operations
- Minimize unnecessary API calls
The result? A smoother and more reliable experience for everyone.
What’s Next? You Decide!We're already planning our next set of features — and we’re listening to you. A huge thank you for the 100+ feedback messages submitted via our questionnaire and email. Your voice shapes our roadmap.
Stay tuned — and keep the suggestions coming!
Cheers,
The CSPaper Team
️
support@cspaper.org
