🚀 Introducing CSPaper Reviews: Get Conference-Style Feedback on Your Research Paper in Under a Minute
-
Tired of submitting your CS paper and waiting months for conference reviews?
Wish you had early feedback tailored to ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, or KDD before submission?We’re excited to launch CSPaper Reviews — a new AI-powered reviewer tool built to help researchers quickly understand how their paper might fare at top-tier computer science conferences.
What is CSPaper Reviews?CSPaper Reviews simulates the peer review process using AI agents tailored to mimic the style and expectations of academic conferences. Whether you're submitting to ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, KDD, or others, CSPaper offers:
Structured, conference-style feedback- Strengths and weaknesses of your draft
- Actionable revision suggestions
- All in under one minute
- Keep your review history
Just specify an arXiv link or upload your PDF, select your target conference, and hit Review.
Try it now
https://review.cspaper.org
🧪 Why Early Access?
This is a preview release, and we’re actively seeking feedback to improve. We welcome input from:
Authors who want to test how useful the feedback is before official submission
️ Reviewers who can assess if this could be a useful aid (or threat!) to the peer review process
We're especially interested in how it helps, where it falls short, and how it could evolve responsibly.
🧠 Sample Use Cases
- Early feedback on clarity, novelty, and relevance
- Dry-run for positioning papers for different venues
- Mentorship tool for first-time authors and student researchers
- Reviewer assistant for triaging or mentoring
We Need Your VoiceIf you're part of the CS research community, your insights are invaluable. Please try it out and share your thoughts:
Feedback: cspaper@googlegroups.com
Try it here: review.cspaper.org
Community Forum: cspaper.org
️ A Note on Responsible UseThis tool does not replace human reviewers — nor is it meant to. Instead, it aims to support iteration and raise the baseline before submission. Like any new technology in peer review, transparency and critique are key.
We hope to make the submission process a bit less opaque and a lot more accessible.
—
The CSPaper Team
Built with and for the research community.
