Benchmark on LLMs and Venues

We rigorously test leading AI models to ensure you get the most accurate, helpful reviews for your research papers. Below you'll find detailed performance metrics comparing the latest LLMs from OpenAI (GPT) and Google (Gemini) across various top-tier computer science conferences.

Try it yourself3 free reviews to start

Privacy and security first

CSPaper ensures all papers remain confidential and legally protected. Content is processed securely and safeguarded under enterprise-level agreements with LLM providers — guaranteeing it is never used to train any model.

Benchmark Metrics

Click on a metric below to view detailed benchmarks

Normalized Mean Absolute Error (NMAE) quantifies how close the predicted paper ratings are to the established ground-truth ratings. Lower NMAE values indicate better alignment between predicted and true review ratings.

Filter by venue type
Venue
GeminiGemini-3.7-flash
OpenAIGPT-5.6-terra
OpenAIGPT-6.1-sol
Z.ai (GLM)GLM-5.3-flash
GeminiGemini-3.1-pro
GeminiGemini-4-argon
Z.ai (GLM)GLM-5v-turbo
ClaudeClaude-sonnet-5.5
OpenAIGPT-5.1
OpenAIGPT-5.4
ESWAmain0.250±0.1910.219±0.1730.106±0.0860.250±0.2210.156±0.1450.179±0.1620.188±0.2110.196±0.2320.125±0.1150.200±0.215
FORGEintelligence0.054±0.0770.136±0.1580.171±0.1470.136±0.1380.241±0.3250.150±0.2070.074±0.0990.117±0.1330.066±0.0920.111±0.143
IJMLCregular0.263±0.2170.346±0.1910.362±0.2990.221±0.2150.179±0.1280.179±0.1280.238±0.1310.221±0.094—0.332±0.307
JBDregular0.179±0.2020.214±0.1570.107±0.1830.214±0.2130.214±0.1870.188±0.1900.179±0.0980.188±0.1900.214±0.2130.214±0.157
MLJregular0.263±0.1800.143±0.1250.144±0.0940.193±0.1660.302±0.2820.192±0.1660.239±0.2960.258±0.1080.217±0.1520.242±0.108
Neurocomputingmain0.240±0.2220.270±0.1910.200±0.2460.215±0.1470.190±0.1380.171±0.1130.122±0.0850.171±0.1130.300±0.2060.275±0.124
PAAregular0.062±0.0830.204±0.2160.246±0.1910.121±0.1290.104±0.1050.188±0.1090.121±0.1080.163±0.187—0.121±0.108
SciRepregular0.300±0.2740.250±0.1770.250±0.0000.100±0.1370.100±0.1370.250±0.3060.200±0.2090.150±0.1370.150±0.1370.150±0.137
TMLRregular0.386±0.2820.175±0.1210.139±0.1040.250±0.2500.250±0.2240.250±0.2090.236±0.1920.333±0.2460.136±0.1040.182±0.141
ToGregular0.117±0.1020.242±0.2530.200±0.2320.200±0.2320.092±0.0960.133±0.1020.117±0.1510.158±0.2430.158±0.147—
TVCregular0.125±0.1580.125±0.1120.250±0.2370.208±0.1710.125±0.1580.167±0.1510.250±0.2090.250±0.177—0.208±0.204
AAAImain technical0.120±0.1310.148±0.1480.116±0.1350.115±0.1010.135±0.1310.083±0.0710.087±0.0930.114±0.1070.150±0.1360.159±0.130
AAAIsafe and robust AI0.167±0.2670.167±0.2310.278±0.2790.328±0.2850.230±0.2450.241±0.2670.222±0.2710.278±0.3040.238±0.2410.214±0.227
AAMASmain technical0.099±0.0810.180±0.0890.146±0.0720.172±0.1210.165±0.2260.176±0.1550.130±0.0830.370±0.3360.240±0.2560.134±0.105
ACLmain0.162±0.1250.158±0.1090.139±0.1400.121±0.1430.213±0.1470.131±0.0990.094±0.1220.097±0.0940.193±0.1610.154±0.144
AI4MetaScienceall0.425±0.3810.300±0.2440.250±0.1250.200±0.1680.200±0.1120.200±0.2440.200±0.2440.200±0.1680.250±0.2500.350±0.185
AISTATSAI review author0.141±0.1700.141±0.1410.203±0.1150.203±0.1480.203±0.1760.167±0.1510.203±0.1480.250±0.1770.141±0.1040.234±0.156
AISTATSmain0.177±0.1750.207±0.2010.191±0.2100.147±0.1550.176±0.1850.194±0.2090.166±0.1520.167±0.1770.231±0.1780.266±0.261
CoGtechnical and vision0.137±0.1170.089±0.1250.079±0.1170.137±0.1170.137±0.1740.117±0.0960.156±0.1050.155±0.1330.107±0.1280.100±0.124
CVPRmain0.231±0.2210.236±0.2180.230±0.2240.186±0.2030.228±0.2050.217±0.2130.204±0.1940.247±0.1980.243±0.2280.242±0.216
DocInsightsall0.158±0.1180.102±0.0650.121±0.1380.065±0.0420.176±0.1460.102±0.0820.120±0.0650.102±0.0420.120±0.1080.102±0.065
ECML-PKDDresearch0.207±0.1720.074±0.0930.121±0.0940.117±0.1250.188±0.1910.147±0.1050.164±0.1500.047±0.0660.141±0.1620.102±0.180
EMNLPmain0.133±0.1100.062±0.0840.078±0.0650.062±0.0880.117±0.0880.062±0.1050.097±0.1040.083±0.1020.183±0.1140.117±0.167
FAccTmain0.286±0.2130.143±0.1520.107±0.1120.143±0.1520.250±0.2390.271±0.2290.250±0.1910.104±0.123—0.107±0.112
GFMall0.170±0.1170.192±0.1310.175±0.1530.147±0.1370.198±0.1300.203±0.2050.170±0.1170.231±0.093—0.164±0.016
ICASSPregular paper0.145±0.1830.264±0.1500.208±0.2640.217±0.2360.246±0.2400.194±0.2210.204±0.1820.250±0.2940.290±0.2520.275±0.239
ICCtechnical symposia0.273±0.2550.217±0.1750.200±0.1770.200±0.1560.287±0.2720.183±0.1830.222±0.1790.183±0.2230.260±0.2530.233±0.241
ICLRmain0.158±0.1330.077±0.0940.125±0.1170.109±0.1200.140±0.1200.182±0.1340.094±0.0780.128±0.0890.104±0.0930.119±0.131
ICMEregular0.130±0.1350.272±0.1400.276±0.1300.189±0.1820.164±0.1600.235±0.2040.191±0.1320.190±0.2010.208±0.1960.253±0.174
ICMLmain0.219±0.1630.133±0.0860.179±0.1500.120±0.0730.186±0.1350.204±0.1390.176±0.1410.166±0.1340.170±0.1230.135±0.115
ICMLposition0.164±0.1240.120±0.0970.126±0.1120.141±0.1050.148±0.1070.134±0.1300.139±0.0940.120±0.1030.207±0.1810.169±0.136
IJCAImain0.127±0.1430.211±0.1330.208±0.1380.178±0.1400.174±0.1430.259±0.2500.111±0.0960.204±0.1630.238±0.1620.190±0.141
IJCAIsurvey0.188±0.2220.188±0.2220.125±0.1340.094±0.1290.188±0.2220.250±0.2240.062±0.1160.083±0.1290.219±0.2810.062±0.116
IROSmain0.107±0.0730.132±0.1550.104±0.1190.139±0.1540.125±0.0650.113±0.1120.104±0.0760.100±0.0870.086±0.0430.121±0.109
KDDdatasets and benchmarks0.242±0.2190.189±0.1790.161±0.1440.189±0.1740.217±0.2050.267±0.2490.217±0.2050.197±0.1930.189±0.1980.180±0.311
KDDresearch0.192±0.1780.183±0.1830.146±0.1390.183±0.1460.180±0.1070.278±0.1720.148±0.1550.167±0.1490.205±0.1820.231±0.174
NeurIPSdatasets and benchmarks0.184±0.2040.210±0.1490.175±0.1750.130±0.0890.161±0.1970.075±0.0690.144±0.0810.225±0.1210.268±0.1870.249±0.196
NeurIPSmain0.233±0.1940.156±0.1500.147±0.1620.156±0.1540.173±0.1680.212±0.2180.151±0.1530.120±0.1620.201±0.1820.140±0.132
SIGIRfull paper0.113±0.2080.188±0.2300.219±0.2090.163±0.2050.125±0.2020.208±0.2460.264±0.3210.250±0.2240.216±0.2630.163±0.205
SIGIRshort paper0.082±0.1220.132±0.1040.168±0.0930.168±0.0930.154±0.1920.083±0.1020.154±0.1270.167±0.1510.189±0.1510.132±0.104
TheWebConfresearch0.116±0.0860.107±0.0940.077±0.0680.166±0.1080.105±0.0850.108±0.0670.115±0.0840.289±0.1120.116±0.0730.149±0.154
WACVmain0.145±0.0930.180±0.1990.150±0.1410.140±0.0970.127±0.1350.167±0.0820.178±0.1560.133±0.1630.273±0.2050.255±0.129

Understanding NMAE

Interpreting the numbers

  • Lower NMAE = better alignment. Top-performing models stay below 0.2.
  • The ± values show standard deviation, reflecting model stability across papers.

How we calculate it

NMAE=1N∑i=1N∣Sgt(i)−Spred(i)∣Smax−Smin\text{NMAE} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{|S_{\text{gt}}^{(i)} - S_{\text{pred}}^{(i)}|}{S_{\text{max}} - S_{\text{min}}}

NN: the total number of benchmark papers included in the evaluation.

Sgt(i)S_{\text{gt}}^{(i)}: ground-truth overall rating of the i-th benchmark paper.

Spred(i)S_{\text{pred}}^{(i)}: predicted overall rating produced by our CSPR agent.

SmaxS_{\text{max}}&SminS_{\text{min}}: venue-specific upper and lower bounds of the rating scale.

Want to learn more?

Explore the research and technical foundations behind CSPaper (a part of Scholar7):

Get high-quality reviews powered by the best AI models

We continuously evaluate and select the best-performing models to ensure you receive accurate, actionable feedback for your research.

Start your free review