🔍 Biggest “System-Prompt Leak” of 2025? — Cursor, Devin AI, Lovable, Manus Agent, Bolt, Replit & v0
-
A LinkedIn post by Alena Panshina claims that full system prompts for seven flagship AI tools just landed on GitHub:
# Tool One-liner Link 1️⃣ Cursor Code editor with integrated AI coding assistance https://lnkd.in/ePTziCFD 2️⃣ Devin AI Autonomous software-development agent https://lnkd.in/esPmmXUj 3️⃣ Lovable Natural-language → code / app generator https://lnkd.in/eUExjpqk 4️⃣ Manus Agent Automates repetitive business workflows https://lnkd.in/etaHqgze 5️⃣ Bolt Team-productivity automation suite https://lnkd.in/eEuc9h-x 6️⃣ Replit Cloud IDE with AI features https://lnkd.in/ey5tWg2t 7️⃣ v0 Generates UI code from design prompts https://lnkd.in/e_jh23sW If authentic, the dump offers a rare peek at production-grade prompt engineering.
Three kickoff questions 🧩
-
Real or Fabrication?
What objective methods—behavioural replication, watermark scanning, delta-diff vs. public docs—could falsify or confirm authenticity? -
Prompt ≠ Model — Where’s the Secret Sauce?
In today’s RAG-plus-tool-calling stacks, how far can just a prompt take you? Where does performance break without orchestration, memory, or fine-tuning? -
Research Goldmine or Legal Quicksand?
Could these files seed prompt-forensics benchmarks, or do they raise IP / ethics flags that make open experimentation risky?
Disclaimer: Authenticity unverified; handle any material that might be proprietary with caution.
-
-
R root moved this topic from Artificial intelligence & Machine Learning